Teaching plan for the course unit

 

 

Close imatge de maquetació

 

Print

 

General information

 

Course unit name: Final Project

Course unit code: 574571

Academic year: 2024-2025

Coordinator: Pilar Sorribas Navarro

Department: Faculty of Economics and Business

Credits: 30

Single program: S

 

 

Estimated learning time

Total number of hours 750

 

Face-to-face and/or online activities

1

 

-  Student presentation and discussion

Face-to-face

 

1

Supervised project

111

Independent learning

638

 

 

Competences / Learning outcomes to be gained during study

 

— Critical reasoning and acknowledgement of the plurality and diversity of social realities.

 

— Ability to formulate research questions or original hypotheses grounded in a relevant theoretical framework and to examine them empirically.

 

— Knowledge forming the basis of original thinking in the development or application of ideas, typically in a research context.

 

— Capacity to apply the acquired knowledge to problem-solving in new or relatively unknown environments within broader (or multidisciplinary) contexts related to the field of study.

 

— Capacity to integrate knowledge and tackle the complexity of formulating judgements based on incomplete or limited information, taking due consideration of the social and ethical responsibilities involved in applying knowledge and making judgements.

 

— Capacity to communicate conclusions, judgements and the grounds on which they have been reached to specialist and non-specialist audiences in a clear and unambiguous manner.

 

— Skills to enable lifelong self-directed and independent learning.

 

— Capacity to recognize, analyse and evaluate the complexity, mechanisms and core challenges of political-institutional development in the long term and to contribute to the resolution of problems arising in this field.

 

— Capacity to apply the appropriate knowledge and theoretical models to solve specific problems related to institutional development and political economy, possibly in new and multidisciplinary environments.

 

— Capacity to read and critically appraise research articles in political science, economics, economic history and related areas and to identify the key contributions to the literature and the current boundaries of the discipline.

 

— Capacity to produce scientific articles fit for publication in recognized social science journals and to present them at international scientific meetings.

 

— Capacity to apply theoretical reasoning to acquire a more detailed understanding of past and present political-institutional realities.

 

— Capacity to select and apply the most suitable methodologies, econometric techniques, information sources, databases and computer tools for the thorough, systematic analysis of political-institutional problems.

 

— Capacity to search for and analyse empirical data and to identify relevant sources of information for acquiring a solid understanding of the institutions and political economy of past and present societies.

 

— Capacity to critically appraise relevant sources of documentation for political and institutional analysis.

 

— Capacity to incorporate the gender perspective into political-institutional analysis, focusing on the gender bias in empirical data.

 

— Capacity to design, plan and carry out an original research study in the field of institutional analysis and political economy and to present and defend the study before an expert audience.

 

 

 

 

Learning objectives

 

Referring to abilities, skills

The master’s degree Final Project (TFM) aims to develop a research project carried out within one of the research lines of the research groups that are linked to the Master’s degree.

Students should be able to:

— Combine and apply in a creative and innovative way the competences that they have acquired in the Master’s degree, and others specifically related to the final project.

— Provide an efficient solution to the problems arisen during the research process.

— Communicate their arguments and conclusions both to specialised and non-specialised audiences, in a clear and unambiguous manner.

— Apply the gender perspective in a systematic way, using language in an inclusive and non-sexist way both in their text and their oral presentation.

 

 

Teaching blocks

 

1. Initial Research Proposal

2. Intermediate Presentation

3. Master’s degree final project

 

 

Teaching methods and general organization

 

The subject does not consist of face-to-face activities carried out in the classroom. The project must consist of an original research work in one of the thematic areas of the Master’s degree (political science, political economy or economic history). It starts with the selection and delimitation of a relevant problem or question, and the presentation of the historical evolution and previous analysis of the topic in a systematic and concise manner. Then, students select the adequate tools for the analysis and extract the appropriate results and conclusions. The formal structure, writing, degree of originality and relevance must correspond to those of an article that could be published in a social science journal with impact factor.

Students present a topic proposal during the first semester of the academic year. The proposal must be accompanied by the name of the academic tutor, who should be a lecturer in the Master’s degree or a renowned researcher belonging to the research groups that participate in the Master’s degree. The tutor gives advice on the objectives and development of the project, revises it periodically and signs the authorisation for its public defence.

The final project must be around 10,000-12,000 words, without including the reference list, tables, figures and appendices. It must include original contributions to the field. It must meet the standards of scientific work. Any form of plagiarism will be penalised.

 

 

Official assessment of learning outcomes

 

 

Examination-based assessment

The Master’s Final Project is an atypical subject with only one call for assessment (and no repeat assessment), although each student can choose to be evaluated either in June or September.

Each student must face a public defence of their work in a session organised in June (or September) in front of the Assessment Committee, composed of three lecturers of the Master’s degree teaching staff.

On a date announced in advance, students submit an electronic version of their paper. These papers are distributed among the members of the Assessment Committee.

In the defence session, each student has approximately 20 minutes for the presentation and 5 minutes for the discussion with the Committee.

Assessment is based on:

— Contents and results: motivation, relevance of the contribution, clarity of results, coincidence between conclusions and results.

— Formal issues: structure of the paper, suggested literature, clarity of definitions and statements, clarity of figures and tables.

— Methodology: use of databases, suitability of the empirical strategy, implementation of techniques, adequacy of proofs.

— Presentation: timing, quality of slides, fluency of verbal communication.