Teaching plan for the course unit

(Short version)

 

Catalā Castellano English Close imatge de maquetació

 

Print

 

General information

 

Course unit name: Culture, Development and Learning in Educational Psychology

Course unit code: 569211

Academic year: 2023-2024

Coordinator: Francisco Javier Onrubia Goņi

Department: Department of Cognition, Development and Educational Psychology

Credits: 3

Single program: S

 

 

Estimated learning time

Total number of hours 75

 

Face-to-face and/or online activities

30

 

-  Lecture with practical component

Face-to-face

 

30

Supervised project

20

Independent learning

25

 

 

Learning objectives

 

Referring to knowledge

  • Analyse the relationships between culture, development, education and learning from a sociocultural perspective.
  • Review the implications and applications of Vygotsky’s thinking and of sociocultural approaches to education, teaching and learning.
  • Explore some of the most relevant dimensions in the design and analysis of school teaching and learning activities, from the perspective of their impact on knowledge construction processes in the classroom.
  • Respect human diversity (differences in gender, culture, abilities and resources), recognise social and economic injustice and adopt an attitude of personal and professional commitment to a continuous process of social change.

 

 

Teaching blocks

 

1. The constructivist conception of school learning and teaching

*  Epistemological coordinates of the constructivist conception. The principles of the constructivist conception and its hierarchical integration. Learning and teaching from a constructivist perception

2. Vygotsky and the social formation of the mind

*  The psychological development of the individual as a socially mediated process. General genetic law, internalization and the zone of proximal development (ZPD). Semiotic mechanisms in the ZPD

3. Guided construction of knowledge

*  Language as a psychological instrument. Guided learning in the use of language and cultural instruments: scaffolding and guided participation. Learning to use language among peers

4. Transforming teaching from a sociocultural perspective

*  The transformed classroom: the "five norms" and the conditions for developing them. Contexts of joint productive activity. Teaching as assisted performance. Propinquity, joint productive activity, intersubjectivity and affinity

5. Education - the door to culture

*  Culturalism’s gaze. Postulates of a psychocultural perspective of education

 

 

Official assessment of learning outcomes

 

Students obtaining a final grade of 9 or more, may, at the discretion of the faculty, be awarded a ’matrícula d’honor’, albeit that no more than 5% of the students enrolled on the course can receive this award.

Student assignments must be original work. Students copying on a test or plagiarising in a written assignment will be deemed to be in breach of the student code and automatically failed (see Article 16.7 and the annex to the Regulations governing the teaching, assessment and grading of learning at the University of Barcelona: http://www.ub.edu/acad/noracad/avaluacio_2020.pdf).

 

Requisites, activities and criteria

Continuous assessment comprises two types of activity:

1. Activities monitoring course subjects. These are completed in class in groups. Student attendance in class is compulsory for presentation of these activities. Roughly, one activity is completed in relation to each topic. Assessment is based on the following criteria: quality of content; the correct and accurate use, as well as exhaustive exploration, of relevant content; and the structuring of the task and the detail in its resolution. Each activity is assessed on a scale from 0 to 10 points. The average of the scores awarded represents 50% of the final grade.

2. Synthesis/summary of course content. This is to be completed individually. It is submitted at the end of the course. In this activity, the adequacy of the report to the guidelines provided is assessed; its structure and detail, its quality of content; and the correct and accurate use, as well as exhaustive exploration of the model content. The activity is assessed on a scale from 0 to 10 points, and it represents 50% of the final grade.

Attendance is compulsory for students opting for continuous assessment. Students must attend at least 75% of the sessions in order to opt for continuous assessment. Likewise, failure to comply with course requisites (readings, task preparation, participation) means students cannot adhere to this mode of assessment.

 

Repeat assessment

Students that fail the continuous assessment mode of evaluation are entitled to repeat the assessment tasks. Students opting for repeat assessment renounce any grades awarded previously as part of their continuous assessment. Repeat assessment comprises a written exam covering all course content. Students sit the exam on the date and time set by the MIPE Academic Committee. The final grade for students sitting the repeat assessment is the grade obtained on this exam and this exam alone.

 

Examination-based assessment

Requisite

In accordance with University regulations, any student can request they be evaluated by single assessment. To do so, they must fill out the "Single assessment request" form, which can be downloaded from the virtual classroom, and submit it no later than twenty calendar days from the start of the course.

 

Activities and criteria

Single assessment consists of a written test covering all course content and set readings. The test is carried out on the date and time set by the MIPE Academic Commission. The final grade for students sitting the single assessment is the grade obtained on this exam and this exam alone.

 

Repeat assessment

Students that fail the single assessment mode of evaluation are entitled to repeat the assessment tasks. Repeat assessment comprises a written exam covering all course content and set readings. Students sit the exam on the date and time set by the MIPE Academic Committee. The final grade for students sitting the repeat assessment is the grade obtained on this exam and this exam alone.

 

 

Reading and study resources

Check availability in Cercabib

Book

Brockbank, A., & McGill, I. (2002). Aprendizaje reflexivo en la educación superior. Morata.

Bruner, J. (1997). La educación, puerta de la cultura. Visor.

Coll, C., Palacios, J., & A. Marchesi, A. (Comps.). (2001). Desarrollo psicológico y educación. Vol 2. Psicología de la educación escolar. Alianza.

Cubero, R. (2005). Perspectivas constructivistas. La intersección entre el significado, la interacción y el discurso. Graó.

Daniels, H. (2001/2003). Vygotsky y la pedagogía. Paidós.

Dewey, J. (1989). Cómo pensamos. Nueva exposición de la relación entre pensamiento reflexivo y proceso educativo. Paidós.

Donald, M. (1991). Origins of the modern mind. Three stages in the evolution of culture and cognition. Harvard University Press.

Kozulin, A. (1990/1994). La psicología de Vygotsky. Alianza.

Kozulin, A. (1998/2000). Instrumentos psicológicos. La educación desde una perspectiva socio-cultural. Paidós.

Mercer, N. (2000/2001). Palabras y mentes. Cómo usamos las palabras para pensar juntos. Paidós.

Olson, D.R. (1994/1998). El mundo sobre el papel. El impacto de la escritura y la lectura en la estructura del conocimiento. Gedisa.

Perrenoud, P. (2010). Desarrollar la práctica reflexiva en el oficio de enseñar. Graó.

Tharp, R. G., Estrada, P., Stoll Dalton, S., & Yamauchi, L. A. (2000/2002). Transformar la enseñanza. Excelencia, equidad, inclusión y armonía en las aulas y las escuelas. Paidós.

Vygotsky, L.S. (1978/1979). El desarrollo de los procesos psicológicos superiores. Crítica.

Vygotsky, L.S. (1986/1995). Pensamiento y lenguaje. Nueva edición a cargo de Alex Kozulin. Paidós.

Wells, G. (1999/2001). Indagación dialógica. Hacia una teoría y una práctica socioculturales de la educación. Paidós.

Wertsch, J. V. (1985/1988). Vygotsky y la formación social de la mente. Paidós.