Teaching plan for the course unit

(Short version)

 

Catalą Castellano English Close imatge de maquetació

 

Print

 

General information

 

Course unit name: Scientific and Professional Communication Procedures, Norms and Practices in Educational Psychology

Course unit code: 569213

Academic year: 2023-2024

Coordinator: MARIONA CORCELLES SEUBA

Department: Department of Cognition, Development and Educational Psychology

Credits: 6

Single program: S

 

 

Estimated learning time

Total number of hours 150

 

Face-to-face and/or online activities

60

 

-  Lecture with practical component

Face-to-face

 

60

Supervised project

40

Independent learning

50

 

 

Learning objectives

 

Referring to knowledge

  • Be familiar with basic research tools for selecting and organising information for professional development, scientific research and academic communication.
  • Analyse the characteristics, conventions and requisites of academic texts in the field of psychology.
  • Appreciate the need for the strategic use of the discursive resources associated with the characteristics, conventions and requisites of academic texts in the field of psychology.
  • Develop the skills of academic literacy that facilitate both this strategic use and participation in the main discourse communities that make up the field of educational psychology.
  • Reflect on one’s identity as an academic writer.
  • Respect human diversity (differences in gender, culture, abilities and resources), recognise social and economic injustice and adopt an attitude of personal and professional commitment to a continuous process of social change.

 

 

Teaching blocks

 

1. Research processes and information selection in the field of educational psychology

*  1.1. Professional development databases

1.2. Research databases

1.3. Regulatory norms

1.4. Decision making in relation to type of search to be conducted and information selection criteria

2. Academic communication: a hybrid activity

*  2.1. Reading in order to write academic texts

2.2. Oral academic communication

3. The academic writing process

*  3.1. Common dilemmas in academic writing

3.2. Regulating the emotional factors that accompany the writing process

3.3. The role of different types of writing in the construction and communication of knowledge

3.4. Writer profiles: knowledge and regulation of the writing process

4. The features and requisites of academic texts in the field of psychology

*  4.1. Norms and conventions

4.2. Text types and academic genres

4.3. Citation style and its effect on the author’s discourse

4.4. Discursive resources and their effect on authorial voice

5. Writing practices in academic, professional and research communities

6. Academic identity and author profile in discourse communities

 

 

Official assessment of learning outcomes

 

Students obtaining a final grade of 9 or more, may, at the discretion of the faculty, be awarded a ’matrícula d’honor’, albeit that no more than 5% of the students enrolled on the course can receive this award.

Student assignments must be original work. Students copying on a test or plagiarising in a written assignment will be deemed to be in breach of the student code and automatically failed (see Article 16.7 and the annex to the Regulations governing the teaching, assessment and grading of learning at the University of Barcelona: http://www.ub.edu/acad/noracad/avaluacio_2020.pdf).

Student attendance and active participation in the course is compulsory. Students must attend at least 75% of the sessions in order to opt for continuous assessment.

Assessment takes into account both process and product.

First, students are expected to participate actively in class and to submit an assignment in which they discuss genres of oral and written communication and reflect on their personal learning on the course (20%).

Second, students produce a group assignment (20%) in which they present different resources of academic and professional communication. In evaluating this assignment, the involvement and cooperation of all team members, mastery of the resources, the design of appropriate activities and a clear, structured presentation are all taken into consideration.

Third, each student’s progress is assessed by means of an argumentative essay (40%) and presentation (20%). The assessment criteria centre on the quality of the argumentation, discourse structure, its coherence and cohesion, linguistic accuracy and the adequacy of formal aspects of writing (citation, references, etc.).

 

Repeat assessment

Students that fail the continuous or final assessment mode of evaluation are entitled to repeat the assessment tasks. Repeat assessment comprises a written exam covering all course content, both theoretical and practical.  Students sit the exam on the date and time set by the MIPE Academic Committee for the repeat assessment of the subject. The final grade for students sitting the repeat assessment is the grade obtained on this exam and this exam alone.

 

Examination-based assessment

Prerequisite
 

In accordance with University regulations, any student can request they be evaluated by single assessment. To do so, they must fill out the "Single assessment request" form, which can be downloaded from the virtual classroom, and submit it within the deadline established by the Faculty of Psychology.

 

Activities and criteria

Single assessment comprises a written exam in which students have to answer questions related to the theoretical and practical themes discussed on the course.

 

Repeat assessment

Students that fail the single or final assessment mode of evaluation are entitled to repeat the assessment tasks. Repeat assessment comprises a written exam covering all course content, both theoretical and practical. Students sit the exam on the date and time set by the MIPE Academic Committee. The final grade for students sitting the repeat assessment is the grade obtained on this exam and this exam alone.

 

 

Reading and study resources

Check availability in Cercabib

Book

Castelló, M. (Coord.), Iñesta, A, Miras, M., Solé, I., Teberosky, A. y Zanotto, M. (2007). Escribir y comunicarse en contextos científicos y académicos. Conocimientos y estrategias. Ed. Graó

Creme, P. y Lea, M.R. (2000). Escribir en la Universidad. Ed. Gedisa

Walker, M. (2000). Cómo escribir trabajos de investigación. Ed. Gedisa  

Chapter

Castelló, M., Bañales, G., Corcelles, M., Iñesta, A. y Vega, N (2011). La voz del autor en los textos académicos: construyendo la identidad como escritor. En C. Monereo y J.I. Pozo, La Identidad en Psicología de la Educación: necesidad, utilidad y límites (pp.153-168). Ed. Narcea

Electronic text

Castelló, M., Bañales, G., Iñesta, A. y Vega, N. (2009). Orientaciones para escribir el proyecto de investigación. Manual de escritura Licensed under a Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 3.0 Unported License. Accesible en: http://recerca.blanquerna.edu/estrategias-lectura-escritura-academica/recursos/