Teaching plan for the course unit

(Short version)

 

Català Castellano English Close imatge de maquetació

 

Print

 

General information

 

Course unit name: Research Methods and Techniques in Educational Psychology

Course unit code: 569215

Academic year: 2023-2024

Coordinator: CRISTA WEISE

Department: Department of Cognition, Development and Educational Psychology

Credits: 6

Single program: S

 

 

Estimated learning time

Total number of hours 150

 

Face-to-face and/or online activities

60

 

-  Lecture with practical component

Face-to-face

 

60

Supervised project

40

Independent learning

50

 

 

Learning objectives

 

Referring to knowledge

This course is structured in two complementary parts. The first part focuses on research papers in general, research papers in the specific field of educational psychology, and methods of qualitative data analysis. The second expands on this overview of research in educational psychology by examining quantitative methods and techniques of data analysis.

Upon successful completion of the course, students should be able to:

  • Identify the key factors for addressing a research problem (that is, its context, research questions, objectives, variables and hypotheses) in educational psychology in formal, non-formal and informal learning environments.
  • Define the research design and select the most appropriate methods and instruments based on the key factors identified for data collection, processing, analysis and evaluation.
  • Analyse research papers in educational psychology that use quantitative, qualitative or mixed methods of analysis.

 

 

Teaching blocks

 

1. Qualitative analysis (Dr Crista Weise)

*  1. Research designs. Qualitative research methods. Phenomenology. Ethnography. Participant action/bifocal approach. Biographical research.

2. Instruments and techniques. Interview. Participant observation. Ethnography. Focus groups. Life stories. Narrative. Visual methods.

3. Introduction to qualitative data analysis. Content analysis. The challenges of data reliability and consistency.

2. Quantitative analysis (Dr Carme Viladrich)

*  1. Planning (statistical inference and experimental control). Types of design according to the treatment of time. Types of design according to experimental control. Design-based inference.

2. Field study (sampling and measures). Populations, samples and sampling units. Number of units per sample. Inferences and sample representativeness. Reliability and validity of observations.

3. Data analysis. Representation in tables and figures. Visual analysis. Techniques of statistical analysis.

 

 

Official assessment of learning outcomes

 

Students obtaining a final grade of 9 or more, may, at the discretion of the faculty, be awarded a ’matrícula d’honor’, albeit that no more than 5% of the students enrolled on the course can receive this award.

Student assignments must be original work. Students copying on a test or plagiarising in a written assignment will be deemed to be in breach of the student code and automatically failed (see Article 16.7 and the annex to the Regulations governing the teaching, assessment and grading of learning at the University of Barcelona: http://www.ub.edu/acad/noracad/avaluacio_2020.pdf).

Attendance and active participation in class sessions is compulsory. Students must attend at least 75% of the sessions in order to opt for continuous assessment.

The subject is assessed in two parts: quantitative analysis and qualitative analysis.

In each of the parts, student participation in classroom activities represents 15%.

Participants have to submit two individual reports (15% each) analysing an article indexed in the Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI), relating to Educational Psychology or Education & Educational Research, examining the criteria presented in each part of the course. Guidelines are provided for this task.

Finally, students have to prepare a team project (maximum of three or four members) which is to be presented orally and in which students should demonstrate their mastery of both general and specific aptitudes. The project represents 40% of the overall grade - 30% for the project itself and 10% for the oral presentation. To pass the subject, students must pass all assessed activities.

Aspects evaluated

% allocated


Participation in the qualitative analysis block

15


Participation in the quantitative analysis block

15


Individual exercises: two reports or analyses of research articles

30 (15 and 15)


Applied exercise: research project design and presentation

40 (30 and 10)

TOTAL

100%



Assessment criteria: conceptual rigour, capacity of analysis and synthesis, adherence with guidelines

 

Repeat assessment

Students that fail the continuous assessment mode of evaluation are entitled to repeat the assessment tasks. Students opting for repeat assessment renounce any grades awarded previously as part of their continuous assessment. Repeat assessment comprises a written exam covering all course content, both theoretical and practical.  Students sit the exam on the date and time set by the MIPE Academic Committee for the repeat assessment of the subject. The final grade for students sitting the repeat assessment is the grade obtained on this exam and this exam only.

 

Examination-based assessment

Prerequisite
 

In accordance with University regulations, any student can request they be evaluated by single assessment. To do so, they must fill out the "Single assessment request" form, which can be downloaded from the virtual classroom, and submit it within the deadline established by the Faculty of Psychology.

 

Activities and criteria

Single assessment comprises a written exam in which students have to complete three exercises, two on the content of each theme taught, and to present a research project related to educational psychology. The first two exercises are worth 2.5 points each and the third is worth 5. To pass the course, students must obtain a minimum score of 5 points.

 

Repeat assessment

Students that fail the single assessment mode of evaluation are entitled to repeat the assessment tasks. Repeat assessment comprises a written exam covering all course content, both theoretical and practical. Students sit the exam on the date and time set by the MIPE Academic Committee. The final grade for students sitting the repeat assessment is the grade obtained on this exam and this exam only.

 

 

Reading and study resources

Check availability in Cercabib

Book

Babbie, E., & Babbie, E. R. (2000). Fundamentos de la investigación social. Cengage Learning Latin Am.

Bardin, L. (1991). Análisis de contenido (3.a ed.). Ediciones Akal.

Canales Cerrón, M. (Coor.-Ed.). (2006). Metodologías de investigación social. Introducción a los oficios. LOM Ediciones.

Hernández, R. (2006). Metodología en la investigación. Mc Graw Hill/ Interamericana de México.

Íñiguez Rueda, L. (Ed.). (2003). Análisis del discurso. Manual para las ciencias sociales. UOC.

Kerlinger, F., & Howard, B. L. (2002). Investigación del comportamiento: Métodos de investigación en ciencias sociales. McGraw Hill.

León, O. G., y Montero, I. (2015). Métodos de investigación en Psicología y Educación. McGraw Hill.

Neuendorf, K. A. (2002). Defining content analysis. Content analysis guidebook. Sage

Article

Caballero Ferrándiz, J., Martín Gutiérrez, P., & R. Villasante, T. (2019). Debatiendo las metodologías participativas: un proceso en ocho saltos. Empiria. Revista de metodología de ciencias sociales, 44(22-45). https://doi.org/10.5944/empiria.44.2019.25350

Hall, L., Dell, C. A., Fornssler, B., Hopkins, C., Mushquash, C., & Rowan, M. (2015). Research as cultural renewal: Applying two-eyed seeing in a research project about cultural interventions in First Nations addictions treatment. International Indigenous Policy Journal, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.18584/iipj.2015.6.2.4

Mazzetti, A., & Blenkinsopp, J. (2012). Evaluating a visual timeline methodology for appraisal and coping research. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 85(4), 649–665. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.2012.02060.x

McAlpine, L. (2016). Why might you use narrative methodology? A story about narrative. Eesti Haridusteaduste Ajakiri. Estonian Journal of Education, 4(1), 32-57. https://doi.org/10.12697/eha.2016.4.1.02b

Wright, A. L., Gabel, C., Ballantyne, M., Jack, S. M., & Wahoush, O. (2019). Using Two-Eyed Seeing in Research With Indigenous People: An Integrative Review. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919869695