|
General information |
Course unit name: Research Methods and Techniques in Educational Psychology
Course unit code: 569215
Academic year: 2023-2024
Coordinator: CRISTA WEISE
Department: Department of Cognition, Development and Educational Psychology
Credits: 6
Single program: S
|
Estimated learning time |
Total number of hours 150 |
|
Face-to-face and/or online activities |
60 |
|
- Lecture with practical component |
Face-to-face |
60 |
|||
|
Supervised project |
40 |
|
Independent learning |
50 |
|
Learning objectives |
|
Referring to knowledge This course is structured in two complementary parts. The first part focuses on research papers in general, research papers in the specific field of educational psychology, and methods of qualitative data analysis. The second expands on this overview of research in educational psychology by examining quantitative methods and techniques of data analysis.
|
|
Teaching blocks |
1. Qualitative analysis (Dr Crista Weise)
* 1. Research designs. Qualitative research methods. Phenomenology. Ethnography. Participant action/bifocal approach. Biographical research.
2. Instruments and techniques. Interview. Participant observation. Ethnography. Focus groups. Life stories. Narrative. Visual methods.
3. Introduction to qualitative data analysis. Content analysis. The challenges of data reliability and consistency.
2. Quantitative analysis (Dr Carme Viladrich)
* 1. Planning (statistical inference and experimental control). Types of design according to the treatment of time. Types of design according to experimental control. Design-based inference.
2. Field study (sampling and measures). Populations, samples and sampling units. Number of units per sample. Inferences and sample representativeness. Reliability and validity of observations.
3. Data analysis. Representation in tables and figures. Visual analysis. Techniques of statistical analysis.
|
Official assessment of learning outcomes |
|
Students obtaining a final grade of 9 or more, may, at the discretion of the faculty, be awarded a ’matrícula d’honor’, albeit that no more than 5% of the students enrolled on the course can receive this award.
Assessment criteria: conceptual rigour, capacity of analysis and synthesis, adherence with guidelines Repeat assessment Students that fail the continuous assessment mode of evaluation are entitled to repeat the assessment tasks. Students opting for repeat assessment renounce any grades awarded previously as part of their continuous assessment. Repeat assessment comprises a written exam covering all course content, both theoretical and practical. Students sit the exam on the date and time set by the MIPE Academic Committee for the repeat assessment of the subject. The final grade for students sitting the repeat assessment is the grade obtained on this exam and this exam only.
Examination-based assessment Prerequisite |
|
Reading and study resources |
Check availability in Cercabib
Book
Babbie, E., & Babbie, E. R. (2000). Fundamentos de la investigación social. Cengage Learning Latin Am.
Bardin, L. (1991). Análisis de contenido (3.a ed.). Ediciones Akal.
Canales Cerrón, M. (Coor.-Ed.). (2006). Metodologías de investigación social. Introducción a los oficios. LOM Ediciones.
Hernández, R. (2006). Metodología en la investigación. Mc Graw Hill/ Interamericana de México.
Íñiguez Rueda, L. (Ed.). (2003). Análisis del discurso. Manual para las ciencias sociales. UOC.
Kerlinger, F., & Howard, B. L. (2002). Investigación del comportamiento: Métodos de investigación en ciencias sociales. McGraw Hill.
León, O. G., y Montero, I. (2015). Métodos de investigación en Psicología y Educación. McGraw Hill.
Neuendorf, K. A. (2002). Defining content analysis. Content analysis guidebook. Sage
Article
Caballero Ferrándiz, J., Martín Gutiérrez, P., & R. Villasante, T. (2019). Debatiendo las metodologías participativas: un proceso en ocho saltos. Empiria. Revista de metodología de ciencias sociales, 44(22-45). https://doi.org/10.5944/empiria.44.2019.25350
Hall, L., Dell, C. A., Fornssler, B., Hopkins, C., Mushquash, C., & Rowan, M. (2015). Research as cultural renewal: Applying two-eyed seeing in a research project about cultural interventions in First Nations addictions treatment. International Indigenous Policy Journal, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.18584/iipj.2015.6.2.4
Mazzetti, A., & Blenkinsopp, J. (2012). Evaluating a visual timeline methodology for appraisal and coping research. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 85(4), 649–665. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.2012.02060.x
McAlpine, L. (2016). Why might you use narrative methodology? A story about narrative. Eesti Haridusteaduste Ajakiri. Estonian Journal of Education, 4(1), 32-57. https://doi.org/10.12697/eha.2016.4.1.02b
Wright, A. L., Gabel, C., Ballantyne, M., Jack, S. M., & Wahoush, O. (2019). Using Two-Eyed Seeing in Research With Indigenous People: An Integrative Review. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919869695