|
General information |
Course unit name: Spaces and Professional Practice in Educational Psychology in Adulthood and Old Age
Course unit code: 575094
Academic year: 2023-2024
Coordinator: ARANTZA DEL VALLE GOMEZ
Department: Faculty of Psychology
Credits: 3
Single program: S
|
Estimated learning time |
Total number of hours 75 |
|
Face-to-face and/or online activities |
30 |
|
- Lecture with practical component |
Face-to-face |
30 |
|||
|
Supervised project |
20 |
|
Independent learning |
25 |
|
Learning objectives |
|
Referring to knowledge
|
|
Teaching blocks |
1. Diversity: lifelong learning and lifewide learning
2. Professionals in education as facilitators of empowering practices
3. Reflection as a key element of professional practice and processes of change
|
Official assessment of learning outcomes |
|
Students who obtains a grade equal to or higher than 9.0, at the discretion of the subject’s teaching staff, can obtain the mention of honors registration, bearing in mind that the number of honors registrations cannot exceed 5% of students enrolled in the subject.
Prerequisit Activities and criteria Registration of training activities (RAF) through a personal learning diary (DPA) carried out during the subject that shows the learning carried out. Contributions and participation in discussions and debates raised in class. Weighting: 15% of the total grade. Completion of an individual synthesis (academic essay, positioning document): Elaboration of a reflective and comparative synthesis between different spaces and practices of care for children, adolescents and young people, and the role of the professional in Psychology education Weighting: 35% of the total grade. Group proposal shared with module A9. Elaboration of an intergenerational proposal/program (which involves children and/or young people and adults and/or elderly people). Let it be a free proposal and limited to the needs detected by each group. The incorporation of the texts and contents worked on in the subjects, genuine bibliographic references that give added value to the proposal will be valued. Weighting: 50% of the total grade DPA,individual synthesis and grup assessment are mandatory tasks for continuous assessment. In this sense, the student who does not hand in one of the two tasks within the established period, and in the case of the DPA, which is incomplete, is considered not presented. Reassessment After the publication of the final grades for the subject, those who have obtained a failing grade in the continuous assessment can re-evaluate the subject. The re-evaluation consists of a written test, which includes all the contents of the subject, both theoretical and practical knowledge. The test is carried out on the date and time set by the Academic Committee of the MIPE for the re-evaluation of the subject. The final grade of the subject if the re-evaluation has been done is obtained exclusively in this test.
Examination-based assessment Examination-based assessment In accordance with the regulations in force at the University of Barcelona, students can apply for the single assessment modality. To do this, they must fill out the "Single evaluation request" form, which they can download from the introductory blog of the subject’s virtual classroom, and hand it in to the teacher during the first 20 calendar days from the start of classes. The single assessment consists of a written test, which includes all the contents of the subject, both theoretical and practical knowledge. The final grade of the subject if the single assessment has been made is the one obtained exclusively in this test. Reassessment After the publication of the final grades for the subject, students who have obtained a failing grade in the single assessment can re-evaluate the subject. The re-evaluation entails the renunciation of all previous continuous evaluation qualifications. The re-evaluation consists of a written test, which includes all the contents of the subject, both theoretical and practical knowledge. The test takes place on the date and time set by the MIPE Academic Committee to reassess the subject. The final grade for the subject if re-evaluation has been done is the grade obtained exclusively in this test. |
|
Reading and study resources |
Check availability in Cercabib
Book
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1987). La ecología del desarrollo humano. Ed. Paidós.
Bruner, J. (1999). La Educación, puerta de la Cultura. Ed. Visor.
Coll,C., Esteban-Guitart,M., i Iglesias,E. (2020). Aprenentatge amb sentit i valor personal. estratègies, recursos i experiències de personalització educativa. Ed. Graó.
Perrenoud, P. (2004). Desarrollar la práctica reflexiva en el oficio de ensenyar. Profesionalización y razón pedagógica. Ed. Graó.
Prieto,D., Herranz,D., y Rodriguez,P. (2015). Envejecer sin ser mayor. Nuevos roles en la participación social en la edad de la jubilación. Estudios de la Fundación Pilares para la autonomía personal nº2.
Vila, I., y Esteban, M. (2017). Familia, escuela y comunidad en las sociedades del siglo XXI. Edi. Horsori.
Chapter
Ezquerra, S., Pérez Salanova, M., Pla, M., y Subirats, J. (2016): Edades en transición. Envejecer en el siglo XXI (pp. 191-195). Editorial Ariel.