|
General information |
Course unit name: Final Project
Course unit code: 365941
Academic year: 2024-2025
Coordinator: Carina Rey Martin
Department: Department of Library and Information Science and Audiovisual Communication
Credits: 9
Single program: S
|
Estimated learning time |
Total number of hours 225 |
|
Face-to-face and/or online activities |
16 |
|
- Lecture with practical component |
Face-to-face |
6 |
|||
|
- Student presentation and discussion |
Face-to-face |
2 |
|||
|
- Seminar |
Face-to-face |
8 |
|||
|
Supervised project |
129 |
|
Independent learning |
80 |
|
Learning objectives |
|
Referring to knowledge The objectives are obviously conditioned by the specific subject chosen, by the type of study undertaken and by the methodology adopted. However, the following might be common objectives:
Referring to abilities, skills
|
|
Teaching blocks |
1. Planning
1.1. Identification of objectives, context and key questions
1.2. Establishment of a methodology
1.3. Selection of resources
1.4. Timing
2. Project development
2.1. Literature review and in-depth study of the bibliography
2.2. Establishment of theoretical frameworks
2.3. Analysis of results
2.4. Drawing conclusions
2.5. Definition of future lines of study
3. Monitoring and presentation
3.1. Progress reports and communication with supervisors
3.2. Learning dossier and carrying out a self-assessment report
3.3. Preparation of executive summaries
3.4. Public presentations and oral defence
|
Official assessment of learning outcomes |
|
Assessment of the dissertation (henceforth TFG) requires students to successfully complete a series of different phases, in which their acquisition of various skills is evaluated. Students cannot pass to the next phase until they have obtained a minimum score on all assessable skills.
The overall grade for these first three phases cannot be less than 5 points out of 10; the overall grade of the executive summary must be equal to or higher than 5 points out of 10, and the overall grade of the oral defence must also be higher than 5 points out of 10. If a final (almost definitive) draft is not submitted, students cannot be assessed and will appear as a ’no show’ (i.e. no presentat) on the final grade record. Students that do not obtain the minimum grade to pass the course appear as ’fail’. Repeat assessment On the corresponding date in the Faculty’s calendar and before the oral defence, students can resubmit TFGs and self-assessment reports that failed to satisfy the examiners due to errors of orthography or syntax or other formal defects, provided they have been revised in line with the tutor’s comments. Similarly, students failing the oral defence or the executive summary can resubmit their corrected work before a new assessment committee. Repeat assessment is carried out six to ten days after the end of the public defence period, but under no circumstances can students with a grade equal to or higher than 5 be reassessed, regardless of the overall grade attained on the course. The maximum grade available to students on the tests forming part of the repeat mode of assessment is 5.
Examination-based assessment The characteristics of this course mean it is suited solely to continuous assessment.
The dates for submitting and defending the TFG are as established in the Faculty’s calendar or as indicated in the Virtual Campus for students presenting their work during the ordinary examination session. The elements for assessment are the same as those established for students presenting their work during the ordinary examination session. |